Appendices

Appendix A - Useful Tables

A.1 Units of Measurement


Parameter

US Customary

Si Metric

Area (Subcatchment)

acres

hectares

Area (Storage Unit)

square feet

square meters

Area (Ponding)

square feet

square meters

Capillary Suction

inches

millimeters

Concentration

mg/L (milligrams/liter)

ug/L (micrograms/liter)

Count/L (counts/liter)

mg/L

ug/L

Count/L

Decay Constant (Infiltration)

1/hours

1/hours

Decay Constant (Pollutants)

1/days

1/days

Depression Storage

inches

millimeters

Depth

feet

meters

Diameter

feet

meters

Discharge Coefficient

Orifice

Weir

 

dimensionless

CFS/foot

 

dimensionless

CMS/meter

Elevation

feet

meters

Evaporation

inches/day

millimeters/day

Flow

CFS (cubic feet / second)

GPM (gallons / minute)

MGD (million gallons/day)

CMS (cubic meters/second)

LPS (liters/second)

MLD (million liters/day)

Head

feet

meters

Hydraulic Conductivity

inches/hour

millimeters/hour

Infiltration Rate

inches/hour

millimeters/hour

Length

feet

meters

Manning's n

seconds/meter1/3

seconds/meter1/3

Pollutant Buildup

mass/length

mass/acre

mass/length

mass/hectare

Rainfall Intensity

inches/hour

millimeters/hour

Rainfall Volume

inches

millimeters

Slope (Subcatchments)

percent

percent

Slope (Cross Section)

rise/run

rise/run

Street Cleaning Interval

days

days

Volume

cubic feet

cubic meters

Width

feet

meters

*Resolution

feet

Meter

*Seepage

in/hr

mm/hr

*only applicable for GeoSWMM 2D Models


A.2 Soil Characteristics


Soil Texture Class

K

Ψ

φ

FC

WP

Sand

4.74

1.93

0.437

0.062

0.024

Loamy Sand

1.18

2.40

0.437

0.105

0.047

Sandy Loam

0.43

4.33

0.453

0.190

0.085

Loam

0.13

3.50

0.463

0.232

0.116

Silt Loam

0.26

6.69

0.501

0.284

0.135

Sandy Clay Loam

0.06

8.66

0.398

0.244

0.136

Clay Loam

0.04

8.27

0.464

0.310

0.187

Silty Clay Loam

0.04

10.63

0.471

0.342

0.210

Sandy Clay

0.02

9.45

0.430

0.321

0.221

Silty Clay

0.02

11.42

0.479

0.371

0.251

Clay

0.01

12.60

0.475

0.378

0.265

K = saturated hydraulic conductivity, in/hr

Ψ = suction head, in

φ = porosity, fraction

FC = field capacity, fraction

WP= wilting point, fraction

Source: Rawls, W.J. et al., (1983). J. Hyd. Engr., 109:1316.


A.3 NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Definitions


Group

Meaning

Saturated HydraulicConductivity(in/hr)

A

Low runoff potential. Soils having high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels.

≥ 0.45

B

Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well-drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures.  E.g., shallow loess, sandy loam. 

0.30 - 0.15

C

Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. E.g., clay loams, shallow sandy loam. 

0.15 - 0.05

D

High runoff potential.  Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a clay-pan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. 

0.05 - 0.00


A.4 SCS Curve Numbers


Land Use Description

Hydrologic Soil Group

A

B

C

D

Cultivated land

Without conservation treatment  

With conservation treatment

 

72

62

 

81

71

 

88

78

 

91

81

Pasture or range land

Poor condition

Good condition

 

68

39

 

79

61

 

86

74

 

89

90

Meadow

Good condition

 

30

 

58

 

71

 

78

Wood or forest land

Thin stand, poor cover, no mulch

Good cover

 

45

25

 

66

55

 

70

77

 

83

77

Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf

courses, cemeteries, etc.

Good condition: grass cover on 75%

or more of the area

Fair condition: grass cover on 50-75%

of the area

 

 

 

39

 

49

 

 

 

61

 

69

 

 

 

74

 

79

 

 

 

80

 

84

Commercial and business areas (85% impervious) 

89

92

94

95

Industrial districts (72% impervious)

81

88

91

93

Residential

Average lot size (% Impervious)

1/8 ac or less (65)

1/4 ac (38)

1/3 ac (30)

1/2 ac (25)

1 ac (20)

 

 

77

61

57

54

51

 

 

85

75

72

70

68

 

 

90

83

81

80

79

 

 

92

87

86

85

84

Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc.

98

98

98

98

Streets and roads

 Paved with curbs and storm sewers

 Gravel

 Dirt

 

98

76

72

 

98

85

82

 

98

89

87

 

98

91

89






A.5 Depression Storage


Surface Type

Depth of Depression Storage

Impervious surfaces

0.05-0.10 inches

Lawns

0.10 - 0.20 inches

Pasture

0.20 inches

Forest litter

0.30 inches

Source: ASCE, (1992). Design & Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems, New York, NY.


A.6 Manning's N - Overland Flow


Surface

n

Smooth asphalt 

0.011

Smooth concrete 

0.012

Ordinary concrete lining

0.013

Good wood

0.014

Brick with cement mortar

0.014

Vitrified clay

0.015

Cast iron

0.015

Corrugated metal pipes 

0.024

Cement rubble surface 

0.024

Fallow soils (no residue)

0.05

Cultivated soils

Residue cover < 20%

Residue cover > 20%

 

0.06

0.17

Range (natural)

0.13

Grass

Short, Prairie

Dense

Bermuda grass

 

0.15

0.24

0.41

Woods

Light underbrush

Dense underbrush

 

0.40

0.80

Source: McCuen, R. et al. (1996), Hydrology, FHWA-SA-96-067, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC


A.7 Manning's N - Closed Conduits


Conduit Material

Manning n

Asbestos-cement pipe

0.011 - 0.015

Brick

0.013 - 0.017

Cast iron pipe

Cement-lined & seal coated

 

0.011 - 0.015

Concrete (monolithic)

Smooth forms

Rough forms

 

0.012 - 0.014

0.015 - 0.017

Concrete pipe

0.011 - 0.015

Corrugated-metal pipe

(1/2-in. x 2-2/3-in. corrugations)

Plain

Paved invert

Spun asphalt lined

 

 

0.022 - 0.026

0.018 - 0.022

0.011 - 0.015

Plastic pipe (smooth)

0.011 - 0.015

Vitrified clay

Pipes

Liner plates

 

0.011 - 0.015

0.013 - 0.017

Source: ASCE (1982). Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction, ASCE Manual of Practice No.60, New York, NY.


A.8 Manning's N - Open Channels


Channel Type

Manning n

Lined Channels

 

- Asphalt

0.013 - 0.017

- Brick

0.012 - 0.018

- Concrete

0.011 - 0.020

- Rubble or riprap

0.020 - 0.035

- Vegetal

0.030 - 0.40

Excavated or dredged

 

- Earth, straight and uniform

0.020 - 0.030

- Earth, winding, fairly uniform

0.025 - 0.040

- Rock

0.030 - 0.045

- Unmaintained

0.050 - 0.140

Natural channels (minor streams,

top width at flood stage < 100 ft)

 

- Fairly regular section

0.030 - 0.070

- Irregular section with pools

0.040 - 0.100

Source: ASCE (1982). Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction, ASCE Manual of Practice No. 60, New York, NY.


A.9 Water Quality Characteristics of Urban Runoff


Constituent

Event Mean Concentrations

TSS (mg/L)

180 – 548

BOD (mg/L)

12 – 19

COD (mg/L)

82 – 178

Total P (mg/L)

0.42 - 0.88

Soluble P (mg/L)

0.15 - 0.28

TKN (mg/L)

1.90 - 4.18

NO2/NO3-N (mg/L)

0.86 - 2.2

Total Cu (ug/L)

43 – 118

Total Pb (ug/L)

182 – 443

Total Zn (ug/L)

202 – 633

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1983). Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP), Vol. 1, NTIS PB 84-185552), Water Planning Division, Washington, DC.


A.10 Culvert Code Numbers


Circular Concrete

1          Square edge with headwall

2          Groove end with headwall

3          Groove end projecting

Circular Corrugated Metal Pipe

4          Headwall

5           Mitered to slope

6          Projecting

Circular Pipe, Beveled Ring Entrance

7          45 deg. bevels

8          33.7 deg. Bevels

Rectangular Box; Flared Wingwalls

9          30-75 deg. wingwall flares

10        90 or 15 deg. wingwall flares

11        0 deg. wingwall flares (straight sides)

Rectangular Box;Flared Wingwalls and Top Edge Bevel:

12        45 deg flare; 0.43D top edge bevel

13        18-33.7 deg. flare; 0.083D top edge bevel

Rectangular Box, 90-deg Headwall, Chamfered / Beveled Inlet Edges

14        chamfered 3/4-in.

15        beveled 1/2-in/ft at 45 deg (1:1)

16        beveled 1-in/ft at 33.7 deg (1:1.5)

Rectangular Box, Skewed Headwall, Chamfered / Beveled Inlet Edges

17        3/4" chamfered edge, 45 deg skewed headwall

18        3/4" chamfered edge, 30 deg skewed headwall

19        3/4" chamfered edge, 15 deg skewed headwall

20        45 deg beveled edge, 10-45 deg skewed headwall

Rectangular Box, Non-offset Flared Wingwalls, 3/4"    Chamfer at Top of Inlet   

21        45 deg (1:1) wingwall flare

22        8.4 deg (3:1) wingwall flare

23        18.4 deg (3:1) wingwall flare, 30 deg inlet skew

Rectangular Box, Offset Flared Wingwalls, Beveled Edge at Inlet Top

24        45 deg (1:1) flare, 0.042D top edge bevel

25        33.7 deg (1.5:1) flare, 0.083D top edge bevel

26        18.4 deg (3:1) flare, 0.083D top edge bevel

Corrugated Metal Box

27        90 deg headwall

28        Thick wall projecting

29        Thin wall projecting

Horizontal Ellipse Concrete

30        Square edge with headwall

31        Grooved end with headwall

32        Grooved end projecting

Vertical Ellipse Concrete

33        Square edge with headwall

34        Grooved end with headwall

35        Grooved end projecting

Pipe Arch, 18" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal

36        90 deg headwall

37        Mitered to slope

38        Projecting

Pipe Arch, 18" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal

39        Projecting

40        No bevels

41        33.7 deg bevels

Pipe Arch, 31" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal

42        Projecting

43        No bevels

44        33.7 deg. bevels

Arch, Corrugated Metal

45        90 deg headwall

46        Mitered to slope

47        Thin wall projecting

Circular Culvert

48        Smooth tapered inlet throat

49        Rough tapered inlet throat

Elliptical Inlet Face

50        Tapered inlet, beveled edges

51        Tapered inlet, square edges

52        Tapered inlet, thin edge projecting

Rectangular

53           Tapered inlet throat

Rectangular Concrete

54        Side tapered, less favorable edges

55        Side tapered, more favorable edges

56        Slope tapered, less favorable edges

57        Slope tapered, more favorable edges


A.11 Culvert Entrance Loss Coefficients


Type of Structure and Design of Entrance

Coefficient

Pipe, Concrete

 

            Projecting from fill, socket end (groove-end) 

0.2

            Projecting from fill, sq. cut end

0.5

Headwall or headwall and wing-walls:

 

            Socket end of pipe (groove-end)

0.2

            Square-edge

0.5

            Rounded (radius = D/12)

0.2

            Mitered to conform to fill slope

0.7

            *End-Section conforming to fill slope

0.5

            Beveled edges, 33.70 or 450 bevels

0.2

            Side- or slope-tapered inlet

0.2

Pipe or Pipe-Arch. Corrugated Metal

 

            Projecting from fill (no headwall)

0.9

            Headwall or headwall and wing-walls square-edge

0.5

            Mitered to conform to fill slope, paved or unpaved slope          

0.7

            *End-Section conforming to fill slope

0.5

            Beveled edges, 33.70 or 450 bevels

0.2

            Side- or slope-tapered inlet

0.2

Box, Reinforced Concrete

 

Headwall parallel to embankment (no wingwalls):

 

            Square-edged on 3 edges

0.5

            Rounded on 3 edges to radius of D/12 or B/12;or Beveled edges on 3 sides

0.2

Wingwalls at 300 to 750 to barrel:

 

            Square-edged at crown

0.4

            Crown edge rounded to radius of D/12; or Beveled top edge

0.2

Wingwall at 100 to 250 to barrel:

 

            Square-edged at crown

0.5

Wingwalls parallel (extension of sides):

 

            Square-edged at crown

0.7

Side- or slope-tapered inlet

0.2

*Note: "End Sections conforming to fill slope," made of either metal or concrete, are the sections commonly available from manufacturers. From limited hydraulic tests they are equivalent in operation to a headwall in both inlet and outlet control. Some end sections, incorporating a closed taper in their design have a superior hydraulic performance. These latter sections can be designed using the information given for the beveled inlet.

Source: Federal Highway Administration (2005). Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts, Publication No.HWA-NHI-01-020.