Appendix A - Useful Tables
A.1 Units of Measurement
Parameter | US Customary | Si Metric |
|---|---|---|
Area (Subcatchment) | acres | hectares |
Area (Storage Unit) | square feet | square meters |
Area (Ponding) | square feet | square meters |
Capillary Suction | inches | millimeters |
Concentration | mg/L (milligrams/liter) ug/L (micrograms/liter) Count/L (counts/liter) | mg/L ug/L Count/L |
Decay Constant (Infiltration) | 1/hours | 1/hours |
Decay Constant (Pollutants) | 1/days | 1/days |
Depression Storage | inches | millimeters |
Depth | feet | meters |
Diameter | feet | meters |
Discharge Coefficient Orifice Weir |
dimensionless CFS/foot |
dimensionless CMS/meter |
Elevation | feet | meters |
Evaporation | inches/day | millimeters/day |
Flow | CFS (cubic feet / second) GPM (gallons / minute) MGD (million gallons/day) | CMS (cubic meters/second) LPS (liters/second) MLD (million liters/day) |
Head | feet | meters |
Hydraulic Conductivity | inches/hour | millimeters/hour |
Infiltration Rate | inches/hour | millimeters/hour |
Length | feet | meters |
Manning's n | seconds/meter1/3 | seconds/meter1/3 |
Pollutant Buildup | mass/length mass/acre | mass/length mass/hectare |
Rainfall Intensity | inches/hour | millimeters/hour |
Rainfall Volume | inches | millimeters |
Slope (Subcatchments) | percent | percent |
Slope (Cross Section) | rise/run | rise/run |
Street Cleaning Interval | days | days |
Volume | cubic feet | cubic meters |
Width | feet | meters |
*Resolution | feet | Meter |
*Seepage | in/hr | mm/hr |
*only applicable for GeoSWMM 2D Models
A.2 Soil Characteristics
Soil Texture Class | K | Ψ | φ | FC | WP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sand | 4.74 | 1.93 | 0.437 | 0.062 | 0.024 |
Loamy Sand | 1.18 | 2.40 | 0.437 | 0.105 | 0.047 |
Sandy Loam | 0.43 | 4.33 | 0.453 | 0.190 | 0.085 |
Loam | 0.13 | 3.50 | 0.463 | 0.232 | 0.116 |
Silt Loam | 0.26 | 6.69 | 0.501 | 0.284 | 0.135 |
Sandy Clay Loam | 0.06 | 8.66 | 0.398 | 0.244 | 0.136 |
Clay Loam | 0.04 | 8.27 | 0.464 | 0.310 | 0.187 |
Silty Clay Loam | 0.04 | 10.63 | 0.471 | 0.342 | 0.210 |
Sandy Clay | 0.02 | 9.45 | 0.430 | 0.321 | 0.221 |
Silty Clay | 0.02 | 11.42 | 0.479 | 0.371 | 0.251 |
Clay | 0.01 | 12.60 | 0.475 | 0.378 | 0.265 |
K = saturated hydraulic conductivity, in/hr
Ψ = suction head, in
φ = porosity, fraction
FC = field capacity, fraction
WP= wilting point, fraction
Source: Rawls, W.J. et al., (1983). J. Hyd. Engr., 109:1316.
A.3 NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group Definitions
Group | Meaning | Saturated HydraulicConductivity(in/hr) |
|---|---|---|
A | Low runoff potential. Soils having high infiltration rates even when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of deep, well to excessively drained sands or gravels. | ≥ 0.45 |
B | Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of moderately deep to deep, moderately well to well-drained soils with moderately fine to moderately coarse textures. E.g., shallow loess, sandy loam. | 0.30 - 0.15 |
C | Soils having slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures. E.g., clay loams, shallow sandy loam. | 0.15 - 0.05 |
D | High runoff potential. Soils having very slow infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted and consisting chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential, soils with a permanent high water table, soils with a clay-pan or clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. | 0.05 - 0.00 |
A.4 SCS Curve Numbers
Land Use Description | Hydrologic Soil Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | |
Cultivated land Without conservation treatment With conservation treatment |
72 62 |
81 71 |
88 78 |
91 81 |
Pasture or range land Poor condition Good condition |
68 39 |
79 61 |
86 74 |
89 90 |
Meadow Good condition |
30 |
58 |
71 |
78 |
Wood or forest land Thin stand, poor cover, no mulch Good cover |
45 25 |
66 55 |
70 77 |
83 77 |
Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc. Good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area Fair condition: grass cover on 50-75% of the area |
39
49 |
61
69 |
74
79 |
80
84 |
Commercial and business areas (85% impervious) | 89 | 92 | 94 | 95 |
Industrial districts (72% impervious) | 81 | 88 | 91 | 93 |
Residential Average lot size (% Impervious) 1/8 ac or less (65) 1/4 ac (38) 1/3 ac (30) 1/2 ac (25) 1 ac (20) |
77 61 57 54 51 |
85 75 72 70 68 |
90 83 81 80 79 |
92 87 86 85 84 |
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
Streets and roads Paved with curbs and storm sewers Gravel Dirt |
98 76 72 |
98 85 82 |
98 89 87 |
98 91 89 |
A.5 Depression Storage
Surface Type | Depth of Depression Storage |
|---|---|
Impervious surfaces | 0.05-0.10 inches |
Lawns | 0.10 - 0.20 inches |
Pasture | 0.20 inches |
Forest litter | 0.30 inches |
Source: ASCE, (1992). Design & Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems, New York, NY.
A.6 Manning's N - Overland Flow
Surface | n |
|---|---|
Smooth asphalt | 0.011 |
Smooth concrete | 0.012 |
Ordinary concrete lining | 0.013 |
Good wood | 0.014 |
Brick with cement mortar | 0.014 |
Vitrified clay | 0.015 |
Cast iron | 0.015 |
Corrugated metal pipes | 0.024 |
Cement rubble surface | 0.024 |
Fallow soils (no residue) | 0.05 |
Cultivated soils Residue cover < 20% Residue cover > 20% |
0.06 0.17 |
Range (natural) | 0.13 |
Grass Short, Prairie Dense Bermuda grass |
0.15 0.24 0.41 |
Woods Light underbrush Dense underbrush |
0.40 0.80 |
Source: McCuen, R. et al. (1996), Hydrology, FHWA-SA-96-067, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC
A.7 Manning's N - Closed Conduits
Conduit Material | Manning n |
|---|---|
Asbestos-cement pipe | 0.011 - 0.015 |
Brick | 0.013 - 0.017 |
Cast iron pipe Cement-lined & seal coated |
0.011 - 0.015 |
Concrete (monolithic) Smooth forms Rough forms |
0.012 - 0.014 0.015 - 0.017 |
Concrete pipe | 0.011 - 0.015 |
Corrugated-metal pipe (1/2-in. x 2-2/3-in. corrugations) Plain Paved invert Spun asphalt lined |
0.022 - 0.026 0.018 - 0.022 0.011 - 0.015 |
Plastic pipe (smooth) | 0.011 - 0.015 |
Vitrified clay Pipes Liner plates |
0.011 - 0.015 0.013 - 0.017 |
Source: ASCE (1982). Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction, ASCE Manual of Practice No.60, New York, NY.
A.8 Manning's N - Open Channels
Channel Type | Manning n |
|---|---|
Lined Channels |
|
- Asphalt | 0.013 - 0.017 |
- Brick | 0.012 - 0.018 |
- Concrete | 0.011 - 0.020 |
- Rubble or riprap | 0.020 - 0.035 |
- Vegetal | 0.030 - 0.40 |
Excavated or dredged |
|
- Earth, straight and uniform | 0.020 - 0.030 |
- Earth, winding, fairly uniform | 0.025 - 0.040 |
- Rock | 0.030 - 0.045 |
- Unmaintained | 0.050 - 0.140 |
Natural channels (minor streams, top width at flood stage < 100 ft) |
|
- Fairly regular section | 0.030 - 0.070 |
- Irregular section with pools | 0.040 - 0.100 |
Source: ASCE (1982). Gravity Sanitary Sewer Design and Construction, ASCE Manual of Practice No. 60, New York, NY.
A.9 Water Quality Characteristics of Urban Runoff
Constituent | Event Mean Concentrations |
|---|---|
TSS (mg/L) | 180 – 548 |
BOD (mg/L) | 12 – 19 |
COD (mg/L) | 82 – 178 |
Total P (mg/L) | 0.42 - 0.88 |
Soluble P (mg/L) | 0.15 - 0.28 |
TKN (mg/L) | 1.90 - 4.18 |
NO2/NO3-N (mg/L) | 0.86 - 2.2 |
Total Cu (ug/L) | 43 – 118 |
Total Pb (ug/L) | 182 – 443 |
Total Zn (ug/L) | 202 – 633 |
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1983). Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP), Vol. 1, NTIS PB 84-185552), Water Planning Division, Washington, DC.
A.10 Culvert Code Numbers
Circular Concrete
1 Square edge with headwall
2 Groove end with headwall
3 Groove end projecting
Circular Corrugated Metal Pipe
4 Headwall
5 Mitered to slope
6 Projecting
Circular Pipe, Beveled Ring Entrance
7 45 deg. bevels
8 33.7 deg. Bevels
Rectangular Box; Flared Wingwalls
9 30-75 deg. wingwall flares
10 90 or 15 deg. wingwall flares
11 0 deg. wingwall flares (straight sides)
Rectangular Box;Flared Wingwalls and Top Edge Bevel:
12 45 deg flare; 0.43D top edge bevel
13 18-33.7 deg. flare; 0.083D top edge bevel
Rectangular Box, 90-deg Headwall, Chamfered / Beveled Inlet Edges
14 chamfered 3/4-in.
15 beveled 1/2-in/ft at 45 deg (1:1)
16 beveled 1-in/ft at 33.7 deg (1:1.5)
Rectangular Box, Skewed Headwall, Chamfered / Beveled Inlet Edges
17 3/4" chamfered edge, 45 deg skewed headwall
18 3/4" chamfered edge, 30 deg skewed headwall
19 3/4" chamfered edge, 15 deg skewed headwall
20 45 deg beveled edge, 10-45 deg skewed headwall
Rectangular Box, Non-offset Flared Wingwalls, 3/4" Chamfer at Top of Inlet
21 45 deg (1:1) wingwall flare
22 8.4 deg (3:1) wingwall flare
23 18.4 deg (3:1) wingwall flare, 30 deg inlet skew
Rectangular Box, Offset Flared Wingwalls, Beveled Edge at Inlet Top
24 45 deg (1:1) flare, 0.042D top edge bevel
25 33.7 deg (1.5:1) flare, 0.083D top edge bevel
26 18.4 deg (3:1) flare, 0.083D top edge bevel
Corrugated Metal Box
27 90 deg headwall
28 Thick wall projecting
29 Thin wall projecting
Horizontal Ellipse Concrete
30 Square edge with headwall
31 Grooved end with headwall
32 Grooved end projecting
Vertical Ellipse Concrete
33 Square edge with headwall
34 Grooved end with headwall
35 Grooved end projecting
Pipe Arch, 18" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal
36 90 deg headwall
37 Mitered to slope
38 Projecting
Pipe Arch, 18" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal
39 Projecting
40 No bevels
41 33.7 deg bevels
Pipe Arch, 31" Corner Radius, Corrugated Metal
42 Projecting
43 No bevels
44 33.7 deg. bevels
Arch, Corrugated Metal
45 90 deg headwall
46 Mitered to slope
47 Thin wall projecting
Circular Culvert
48 Smooth tapered inlet throat
49 Rough tapered inlet throat
Elliptical Inlet Face
50 Tapered inlet, beveled edges
51 Tapered inlet, square edges
52 Tapered inlet, thin edge projecting
Rectangular
53 Tapered inlet throat
Rectangular Concrete
54 Side tapered, less favorable edges
55 Side tapered, more favorable edges
56 Slope tapered, less favorable edges
57 Slope tapered, more favorable edges
A.11 Culvert Entrance Loss Coefficients
Type of Structure and Design of Entrance | Coefficient |
|---|---|
Pipe, Concrete |
|
Projecting from fill, socket end (groove-end) | 0.2 |
Projecting from fill, sq. cut end | 0.5 |
Headwall or headwall and wing-walls: |
|
Socket end of pipe (groove-end) | 0.2 |
Square-edge | 0.5 |
Rounded (radius = D/12) | 0.2 |
Mitered to conform to fill slope | 0.7 |
*End-Section conforming to fill slope | 0.5 |
Beveled edges, 33.70 or 450 bevels | 0.2 |
Side- or slope-tapered inlet | 0.2 |
Pipe or Pipe-Arch. Corrugated Metal |
|
Projecting from fill (no headwall) | 0.9 |
Headwall or headwall and wing-walls square-edge | 0.5 |
Mitered to conform to fill slope, paved or unpaved slope | 0.7 |
*End-Section conforming to fill slope | 0.5 |
Beveled edges, 33.70 or 450 bevels | 0.2 |
Side- or slope-tapered inlet | 0.2 |
Box, Reinforced Concrete |
|
Headwall parallel to embankment (no wingwalls): |
|
Square-edged on 3 edges | 0.5 |
Rounded on 3 edges to radius of D/12 or B/12;or Beveled edges on 3 sides | 0.2 |
Wingwalls at 300 to 750 to barrel: |
|
Square-edged at crown | 0.4 |
Crown edge rounded to radius of D/12; or Beveled top edge | 0.2 |
Wingwall at 100 to 250 to barrel: |
|
Square-edged at crown | 0.5 |
Wingwalls parallel (extension of sides): |
|
Square-edged at crown | 0.7 |
Side- or slope-tapered inlet | 0.2 |
*Note: "End Sections conforming to fill slope," made of either metal or concrete, are the sections commonly available from manufacturers. From limited hydraulic tests they are equivalent in operation to a headwall in both inlet and outlet control. Some end sections, incorporating a closed taper in their design have a superior hydraulic performance. These latter sections can be designed using the information given for the beveled inlet.
Source: Federal Highway Administration (2005). Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts, Publication No.HWA-NHI-01-020.